Pages

April 01, 2012

But for Audio

An incidental recording taken while a Florida woman was on the phone with her insurance company shows that the police who arrested her and charged her with a felony for resisting arrest lied in their reports, and then again under questioning.

Here is the cops’ story:

The . . . ordeal began late-afternoon on Oct. 4, when Fernandes, a four-year CSPD veteran with no previous internal affairs complaints on his record, noticed Mait’s Lexus SUV stopped in the left lane of Royal Palm Boulevard.

Fernandes, 35, pulled up behind her vehicle to see what was wrong. Mait approached his car and told him that two of her tires had blown out, and she needed a tow . . .
According to police reports and the officers’ sworn depositions, Mait told Fernandes and later Stasnek, who arrived as backup, that she was on Xanax, and that she couldn’t move the car out of traffic — but that she did want to drive it the two miles to her home.

Before Stasnek pulled up, Fernandes told Mait to call for a tow, which she did from her passenger seat. But as she waited for a GEICO roadside assistance representative to dispatch a wrecker, things unraveled.

When Stasnek, a four-year member of the force with a clean prior record, approached Mait’s SUV, she repeatedly asked for a driver’s license, the tape shows. Mait refused. In her deposition, Stasnek said she warned the driver repeatedly she “would be disobeying my lawful command and would be arrested for resisting my lawful command.”

At some point, Mait put a hand in the officer’s face to dismiss the request, according to police accounts, which was apparently one insult too many.

The officers hauled her out of her car and tried to arrest her, which they claim she resisted by tensing her body and slamming into Stasnek.

The alleged Xanax didn’t show up in toxicology tests. And then Mait’s attorney got the recording:

The 17-minute recording features a series of exchanges that Catalano says contradict the officers’ sworn testimony, including this back-and-forth between Mait and Stasnek after the female officer asked for ID:

Mait: “Did you not see me on the phone?”

Stasnek: “Did you not see this uniform I have on? Don’t give me any s— right now. Give me your f—ing driver’s license.”

During her deposition, Stasnek was asked by Catalano — who did not tell the officers the encounter had been recorded — if she had used those words. She twice said no.

Catalano also pressed both officers under oath on whether Stasnek had given Mait notice that the driver was disobeying a lawful command. Both officers testified she had — at least twice. The recording catches no such exchange, although it is possible she did during a short stretch when GEICO had Mait on hold.

Late in the recording, while Mait can be heard sobbing in the distance, the officers say the following:

Fernandes: “I didn’t hear anything you said. I was in the back of the car.”

Stasnek: “I did drop the F-bomb.”

Fernandes, laughing: “I didn’t hear that. In my [internal affairs] statement, I’ll say I didn’t hear that. … Don’t worry, I will put everything I heard beforehand.”

8 comments:

  1. Let's not forget that if a potential police recruit has an IQ that is above average, they are disqualified. Intelligence is a big no no if you want to wear that uniform.

    I think this kind of sums up what happened here.

    ReplyDelete
  2. IMHO - An automatic sacking offence. Should be a sacking offence each and every time an officer is caught lying to acheive a prosecution. No exceptions!

    However - in my experience - it will probably just be brazened out. The two officers involved here will most likely get a promotion sometime soon for meeting their "crime catching and prosecution targets"!

    ReplyDelete
  3. ...and police officers wonder why no one shows them any respect or ever has anything good to say about them? I have never seen police stop or solve a single crime because they are cowards who bully people for money to pay their salaries.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Got them monkey on purgery!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Cops Lie?!?!??! No Shiot! They Lie a lot. I was one. I know firsthand of the deceit. There are many small minded, uneducated, chip on their shoulder types in the force. There are also many good ones. Trouble is we all stuck together when one lied. We sort of had to, or else your life in the force was ruined.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So you were happy to ruin someone else's life, by committing perjury.

      That is why you are all lumped into one classification : Lying, dishonest corrupt scum.

      There are no "good one's". Good one's would arrest and charge the "Bad one's"
      Until that happens EVERY time a cop pulls these kind of stunts, you are all Bad one's.

      Delete
  6. i agree, also didnt you take an oath to serve and protect? well them if you were worried about your life being made misrable mayb you should have put your morals first and quit instead of choosing to break the law to make your own life easier. Im not saying your a bad person but you clearly made a wrong moral choice in my eyes.

    ReplyDelete
  7. You people are crazy. Cops lie all the time on reports, fabricate and withhold evidence. policeabuse.weebly.com

    ReplyDelete