Much about the Black Lives Matter movement doesn’t add up. From one of its leaders really being white while pretending to be black to the allegations that many protesters were actually a paid “rent-a-mob” financed by George Soros, this so-called spontaneous civil rights movement appears to be filled with contradictions.
Teaparty.org tells more:
In an article which details the philosophical foundation of ‘Black Lives Matter’, Garza cites, “Assata’s powerful demand in my organizing work.”
Yet, as teaparty.org reveals, the young ideologues in the Black Lives Matter movement think this terrorist murderer is some kind of civil rights heroine:
The real question is, now that Obama has normalized relations with Cuba, will he pardon her so she can come home and receive the sycophantic worship of these young deluded idealists?
Given Assata Shakur’s role as an icon and an inspiration to the ‘Black Lives Matter’ movement, is BLM really about addressing police brutality, or is it about the re-emergence of a militant leftist revolutionary movement that, with the aid of billionaires like George Soros, who has funded coups overseas, intends to use violence to change society?